Cit v hindustan bulk carriers
WebIn the case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers [4] the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down following points to be considered for harmonious construction: It is duty of the court to keep away from two-seemingly contradicting sections of the Act and try to harmonize them unless WebDec 14, 2024 · In CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, (2003) 3 SCC 57, p. 74 case, the Court held that the courts must avoid a ‘head of clash’ of contradictory provisions and they must construe the contradictory …
Cit v hindustan bulk carriers
Did you know?
WebJun 16, 2024 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers, (2003) 3 SCC 57, p. 74. viiSultana Begum v. Premchand Jain, AIR 1997 SC 1006, pp. 1009, 1010. viiiCIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, (2003) 3 SCC 57, p. 74. ixIbid. xState of U.P. v. Renusagar Power Co., AIR 1988 SC 1737, p. 1751. xiOSBORN’S Law Dictionary. WebFeb 26, 2024 · In the landmark case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers [4], the Supreme Court laid down five rules of conducting the doctrine of harmonious construction:- The courts must avoid any clash of seemingly contradicting provisions, and they should try to harmonize such contradictory or contrasting provisions.
WebDec 29, 2024 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers, the Supreme Court of India established the fundamental five tenets of the harmonious construction rule. It is the responsibility of the court to avoid a dispute between two legislation sections by harmonizing them so that both remain in effect. WebJan 24, 2024 · In Indian constitution, no absolute right is given to its citizens therefore Art 20 (1) subject to certain restrictions. Preventive Detention In order to maintain peace and to …
WebDec 17, 2002 · Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers Supreme Court Of India Dec 17, 2002 Subsequent References CaseIQ TM (AI Recommendations) Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers Important Paras Please … WebDec 17, 2002 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers C.A.No.7966 - 67 of 1996 Decided On, 17 December 2002 At, Supreme Court of India By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.B. …
WebThe Supreme Court in the CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, 259 ITR 449 pointed out that there is no power to waive tax or interest as tax or interest has to be determined under the provisions of the Act. 4.
WebThis rule evolved from the case Shankari Prasad v. Union of India3 where there was a conflict between part III and part IV of the constitution. The Supreme Court used the principle of ... CIT v. Hindustan bulk carriers4: The Supreme Court of India has given five principles of Harmonious Construction. 4 AIR (2003) SC 3942 . diamond creek breweryWebDec 21, 2024 · The Doctrine of Harmonious Construction: The Parliament makes a separate set of statutes, rules, legislation, and constitutional provisions under their well-defined powers. While framing these provisions has to be done very carefully, conflict sometimes occurs due to overlapping in their enforcement. diamond creek apartments morgan hill caWebDec 21, 2024 · Venkataramana Devaru v. State of Mysore, 1958 AIR 255. Justice GP Singh, Principles of Statutory Interpretation, 9th edn (2004) 131. CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers (2003) 3 SCC 57. Raj Krushna Bose v. Binod Kanungo & ors, 1954 AIR 202. Representation of People Act, 1951 Section 33(2) & 123(8). M.S.M. Sharma v. Krishna Sinha, AIR … circuit city bookshelf speakersWebHindustan Bulk Carriers. 3. Doctrine of Eclipse This doctrine is applicable to pre-existing laws under Article 13 (1). Article 13 provides that any law which made before the commencement of constitution must be consistent with the part III of the constitution. diamond creek childcareWebCommissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S. Hindustan Bulk Carriers on 17 December, 2002. Author: A Pasayat. Bench: Arijit Pasayat. CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 7966-67 of … diamond creek bowls clubWebIn CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, the supreme court stated five important principles and they are: The courts must avoid a clash on contradicting provisions and they must … diamond creek christmas marketWebApr 17, 2024 · In the landmark case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers,[3] TheHon’ble Supreme Court laid down five principles of rule of harmonious construction [4] :- The courts must avoid a head-on clash of seemingly … circuit city boston